Designing for Mediocrity


Why isn’t all design universal?
January 13, 2009, 1:57 pm
Filed under: Observations, Statements

Isn’t the goal of design to meet the needs of the most people possible? Today we distinguish between universal design and non-universal design which means most of the design excludes a major part of the people (silver agers, handicapped people…). It is self-understandig that design is perceived as something exclusive (it excludes).

How can design look like that is including in all senses? Design for the masses?



could this be it?
January 13, 2009, 1:15 pm
Filed under: Inspirations | Tags: ,

do_frame2

Looking for a product that re-interpretes and reflects mediocrity:

- taking up something traditional/average

- taking up a tendency of the masses (for doing-yourself)

- taking up the demand for something cheap

and combining it with a sense of self-irony

Could this be it?

guixe_do_frame_jun_04

(MartĂ­ GuixĂ© – Do-Frame Tape)